ABSTRACT
Lung and colorectal cancers (CRC) have two of the highest mortality rates among all cancer types, and their occurrence and the need for personalized diagnostics and subsequent therapy were not influenced by the COVID-19 pandemics. However, due to the disruption of established delivery chains, standard assays for in vitro diagnostics of those cancers were temporarily not available, forcing us to implement alternative testing methods that enabled at least basic therapy decision making. For this reason, we evaluated rapid testing on the Biocartis Idylla™ platform (Biocartis, Mechelen, Belgium) for four important genes commonly mutated in lung and colorectal cancers, namely EGFR, NRAS, KRAS, and BRAF. Clinical specimens from which the mutation status has previously been determined using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), were retested to determine whether Idylla™ can offer accurate results. To compare the results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) are calculated for each of the mutation types and then combined to determine the values of the Idylla™ system in total, while setting NGS as the gold-standard basis the assays were compared with. Idylla testing thereby displayed acceptable sensitivity and specificity and delivered reliable results for initial therapy decisions.
Subject(s)
DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Pandemics , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Brochoalvelolar lavages (BALs) from patients suffering from hospitalized infections with SARS-CoV-2, other corona viruses (human coronavirus (HCoV)-229E, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-HKU1), Influenza virus type A and B, Haemophilus influenzae and Pneumocystis jirovecii were compared cytopathologically.The aim of the study was to evaluate if the cellular profile detectable in BAL may be specific for the respective pathogens and could lead to diagnosis of COVID-19 even in the absence of PCR results.Differential cytology and flow cytometry datasets of 62 patients were observed and compared.We observed a significant association between individual cell pattern changes and the causing pathogen, but no general cell distribution pattern.The cytology pattern of the BAL fluid in COVID-19 is not specific enough to use it as a sole diagnostic criterion, although it may support clinical decision making.